E. Stover et C. Walsh, CROWN GALL IN APPLE ROOTSTOCKS - INOCULATION ABOVE AND BELOW SOIL ANDRELATIONSHIP TO ROOT MASS PROLIFERATION, HortScience, 33(1), 1998, pp. 92-95
Trees of each of five apple (Malus xdomestica Borkh.) rootstocks were
inoculated above and below ground with three strains of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens (Smith & Townsend) Conn. (AT). These were compared with co
ntrols that were not wounded or mounded and treated with sterile deion
ized water. Percentage of inoculated sites forming galls above ground
was significantly greater in Mark and Malling 9 (M.9 EMLA) than in all
other rootstocks except M.26 EMLA at 18 months after inoculation. At
both 4 and 18 months after inoculation, gall formation below ground on
M.7A was twice as high as above ground, but within other rootstocks,
gall formation above and below ground was similar. For the rootstock x
strain interaction of AT both 4 and 18 months after inoculation, each
measure of crown gall susceptibility above ground was significantly c
orrelated with corresponding below-ground data at P less than or equal
to 0.01. This high correlation and frequent occurrence of galls or pr
otruding callus from wounds below ground in controls suggest that abov
e-ground inoculations are suitable for evaluating crown gall susceptib
ility in apple rootstocks. Eighteen months after inoculation most of t
he Mark trees had developed characteristic root mass proliferation (RM
P). Three years after inoculation few crown galls mere apparent below
ground in Mark rootstock, but all but one of trees examined had develo
ped RMP. Among other rootstocks only three (38%) M.9 EMLA trees and on
e (8%) M.7A tree produced swellings identified as RMP, and all but one
(5%) of these trees had been inoculated with AT. Pockets of callus sc
attered throughout the xylem were observed when Mark RMP mere examined
microscopically. RMP from other rootstocks and most crown galls conta
ined similar pockets of callus. Although inoculation with AT did not e
nhance RMP development in Mark, experimental results are not inconsist
ent with some AT involvement in RMP. Mark RMP is more extensive but no
t qualitatively different from structures formed at a lower frequency
in M.9 EMLA and M.7A inoculated with AT.