DIURNAL AND SEASONAL COURSE OF MONOTERPENE EMISSIONS FROM QUERCUS-ILEX (L.) UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS - APPLICATIONS OF LIGHT AND TEMPERATURE ALGORITHMS
N. Bertin et al., DIURNAL AND SEASONAL COURSE OF MONOTERPENE EMISSIONS FROM QUERCUS-ILEX (L.) UNDER NATURAL CONDITIONS - APPLICATIONS OF LIGHT AND TEMPERATURE ALGORITHMS, Atmospheric environment, 31, 1997, pp. 135-144
Quercus ilex is a common oak species in the Mediterranean vegetation a
nd a strong emitter of monoterpenes. Since the short-term control of m
onoterpene emissions from this species involved both temperature and l
ight, the usual exponential function of temperature may not be suffici
ent to model the diurnal and seasonal emission course. In the frame of
the BEMA-project (Biogenic Emissions In the Mediterranean Area), we i
nvestigated the tree-to-tree, branch-to-branch, diurnal, and seasonal
variability of monoterpene emissions from Q. ilex over one and a half
years at Castelporziano (Rome, Italy). In addition, we checked the sui
tability of the model developed for isoprene by Guenther et al. (1991,
1993) to simulate the short-and long-term variations of monoterpene e
missions from this particular species. We found that the tree-to-tree
variability was rather small compared to the experimental error during
air sampling and analysis by diverse laboratories. The branch-to-bran
ch variability was noticeable between sun-and shade-adapted branches o
nly. 80% of total emissions were represented by alpha-pinene, beta-pin
ene and sabinene, whose proportions were stable over the year and inde
pendent of light exposure. The emission factor (emission rate at 30 de
grees C and 1000 mu mol photon m(-2) s(-1)) estimated by the isoprene
model or extrapolated from measurements was similar: it was about 22 m
u g g dw(-1) h(-1) for sun-exposed branches and 2.3 mu g g dw(-1) h(-1
) for shade-adapted branches. It was rather stable over the seasons ex
cept during leaf development. The diurnal and seasonal emission patter
ns From Q. ilex were simulated in a satisfying way by Guenther's algor
ithms especially if we excluded the laboratory variability. For shade-
adapted branches, an emission factor 17 times lower had to be applied,
but temperature and light responses were unchanged. (C) 1997 Elsevier
Science Ltd.