Jl. Bourgain et al., PRESSURE CONTROL IN CENTRAL MEDICAL GAS-S UPPLY SYSTEMS, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation, 16(8), 1997, pp. 940-944
Objective: To assess whether the pressure gauges at the downstream par
t of pressure regulators are accurate enough to ensure that pressure i
n O-2 pipeline is always higher than in Air pipeline and that pressure
in the latter is higher than pressure in N2O pipeline. A pressure dif
ference of at least 0.4 bar between two medical gas supply systems is
recommended to avoid the reflow of either N2O or Air into the O-2 pipe
line, through a faulty mixer or proportioning device. Study design: Pr
ospective technical comparative study. Material and methods: Readings
of 32 Bourdon gauges were compared with data obtained with a calibrate
d reference transducer. Two sets of measurements were performed at a o
ne month interval. Results: Pressure differences between Bourdon gauge
s and reference transducer were 8% (0.28 bar) in average for a theoret
ical maximal error less than 2.5%. During the first set of measurement
s, Air pressure was higher than O-2 pressure in one place and N2O pres
sure higher than Air pressure in another. After an increase in the O-2
pipeline pressure and careful setting of pressure regulators, this pr
oblem was not observed at the second set of measurements. Discussion:
Actual accuracy of Bourdon gauges was not convenient enough to ensure
that O-2 pressure was always above Air pressure. Regular controls of t
hese pressure gauges are therefore essential. Replacement of the fault
y Bourdon gauges by more accurate transducers should be considered. As
an alternative, the increase in pressure difference between O-2 and A
ir pipelines to at least 0.6 bar is recommended.