USEFULNESS OF URINE AND BLOOD CULTURES FO R DIAGNOSING CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION IN THE KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT

Citation
Jr. Prieto et al., USEFULNESS OF URINE AND BLOOD CULTURES FO R DIAGNOSING CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION IN THE KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT, Revista Clinica Espanola, 198(1), 1998, pp. 3-6
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00142565
Volume
198
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
3 - 6
Database
ISI
SICI code
0014-2565(1998)198:1<3:UOUABC>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Objective. To prospectively and comparatively study the usefulness of urine (viruria) and blood (antigenemia pp65 and culture) (viremia) for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in renal transplant (RT) recipients. Material and methods. All RT recipients at our hospit al were studied from January 1995 to December 1996. After decontaminat ion, urine specimens were inoculated into two MRC-5 cell line vials. P olymorphonuclear cells were extracted from peripheral blood by sedimen tation in saline dextran and were used for antigenemia pp65 test and f or culture in shell-vial. Results. A total of 1,335 specimens from 43 patients were studied. CMV was recovered from 110 out of the 913 (12%) urine specimens and from 101 out of the 422 (23.9%) blood specimens ( antigenemia and/or viremia). CMV detection was first obtained by a pos itive blood test in 23 patients (88.4%), whereas the urine specimen wa s the first positive test in only three (11.6%) patients (p = 0.0001). A positive result in blood preceded a positive result in urine by a m ean of 10.3 days (range: 2-73 days). Antigenemia and viremia were simu ltaneously positive in 61.5% of patients. In three patients a positive antigenemia preceded viremia by 14 days. In seven patients (26.9%) on ly the shell-vial culture was positive. Culture preceded antigenemia b y a mean of 7.6 days. In the 26 patients, the time elapsed until the f irst positive blood specimen for CMV was 37.3 days (range: 11-88 days) . Conclusion. According to the results obtained we believe that blood (antigenemia pp65 and/or viremia) should be considered as the only rea lly useful specimen for the diagnosis of infection/disease caused by C MV in RT recipients. The urine specimen lacks a diagnostic and clinica l usefulness and therefore should not be used in these patients.