LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASE IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL-BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL-INJECTED SCID MICE - IV - DIFFERENTIAL ACTIVATION OF HUMAN TH1 AND TH2 LYMPHOCYTES AND INFLUENCE OF THE ATOPIC STATUS ON LYMPHOMA DEVELOPMENT
V. Coppola et al., LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISEASE IN HUMAN PERIPHERAL-BLOOD MONONUCLEAR CELL-INJECTED SCID MICE - IV - DIFFERENTIAL ACTIVATION OF HUMAN TH1 AND TH2 LYMPHOCYTES AND INFLUENCE OF THE ATOPIC STATUS ON LYMPHOMA DEVELOPMENT, The Journal of immunology, 160(5), 1998, pp. 2514-2522
Intraperitoneal transfer of PBMC from EBV+ donors into SCID mice lends
to high human Ig levels in mouse serum and B cell lymphoproliferative
disease, As these events depend on the activation of coinjected human
T cells, we addressed the behavior of the Th1 and Th2 subsets in this
model, Production of IFN-gamma, but not of Th2 cytokines such as IL-4
, was detected in culture supernatants of PBMC stimulated in vitro wit
h mouse splenocytes. Moreover, anti-CD3 stimulation of the human cells
recovered from mice brought about IFN-gamma, but not IL-4, synthesis;
on the other hand, PCR and in situ hybridization analysis of ex vivo-
recovered cells disclosed the presence of mRNA for both cytokines foll
owing in vitro restimulation, thus suggesting posttranscriptional regu
lation of IL-4 gene expression, When SCID mice were inoculated with PB
MC from atopic donors, whose Th1/Th2 profile displays an imbalance tow
ard Th2 cells, tumor development rates were lower, and tumor latency w
as higher, compared with those in mice injected with PBMC from normal
donors, Isotypic analysis of human Ig in mouse serum showed the exclus
ive presence of IFN-gamma-driven IgG subclasses; in addition, human Ig
E were low or undetectable in most cases, These findings indicate that
following transfer into SCID mice, human Th1 lymphocytes undergo pref
erential activation, whereas Th2 function is down-regulated, Th1 lymph
ocytes probably are a major component in promoting EBV+ B cell expansi
on and tumor development; the individual Th1/Th2 profile could in part
account for the as yet unexplained donor variability in tumor generat
ion in this experimental model.