C. Tsouris et al., COMPARISON OF LIQUID-LIQUID DISPERSIONS FORMED BY A STIRRED-TANK AND ELECTROSTATIC SPRAYING, Chemical engineering communications, 160, 1997, pp. 175-197
Two methods of producing liquid-liquid dispersions are compared in ter
ms of the dispersed phase drop-size, energy requirements, and other pr
operties. In the first method, a stirred-tank contactor, used for labo
ratory bioprocessing studies, was employed. Experiments were conducted
using a 10cm-diameter cylindrical tank, stirred by one or two 5cm-dia
meter 6-blade Rushton-turbine impellers. The transient drop-size distr
ibution of kerosene in water was measured by a video technique. It was
found that (i) the drop-size had not reached steady state even after
10 hrs of agitation, and (ii) the drop-size produced by one impeller w
as smaller than that produced by two impellers. In the second method a
queous droplets were electrohydrodynamically generated at the tip of a
metal capillary under the influence of a pulsed, direct-current (de)
voltage. The capillary tube was located co-axially at the center of an
other tube made of a dielectric (teflon) wall. Kerosene was pumped bet
ween the capillary and the outer tube. An electric field was formed be
tween the electrically-grounded capillary tube and an electrified elec
trode mounted on the external surface of the outer dielectric tube. Po
sitive, sinusoidal-type voltage pulses in the range of 10-25 kV at fre
quency between 3.4 and 3.7 kHz were applied and the electric current w
as measured. The size of the drops ejected from the capillary was meas
ured by a laser light scattering facility and found to be in the range
1 to 100 mu m. Single and multiple spraying cones were observed depen
ding on the aqueous-phase flow-rate. Smaller drop-size was obtained wh
en multiple-cone spraying occurred. Energy calculations showed that di
lute dispersions can be produced more efficiently by electrostatic spr
aying than by mechanical agitation.