Yj. Gu et al., REDUCTION OF THE INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING MINIMALLY INVASIVE CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 65(2), 1998, pp. 420-424
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Cardiac & Cardiovascular System","Respiratory System
Background. The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether
the inflammation-associated clinical morbidity as well as the subclin
ical markers of the inflammatory response are reduced in patients who
undergo minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting without car
diopulmonary bypass. Methods. From June 1995 to June 1996, 62 consecut
ive patients with isolated stenosis of the left anterior descending co
ronary artery were assigned randomly to two groups: 31 patients underw
ent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting and 31 patients
underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopul
monary bypass. In a subgroup of 10 patients in each group, subclinical
markers were measured to determine the level of the inflammatory resp
onse generated during the operation. Results. In the group that underw
ent minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting, leukocyte elas
tase, platelet beta-thromboglobulin, and complement C3a were unchanged
at the end of the procedure compared with their baseline concentratio
ns, whereas these inflammatory markers were increased significantly in
the group that underwent conventional coronary artery bypass grafting
with cardiopulmonary bypass. The patients who underwent minimally inv
asive coronary artery bypass grafting had a shorter duration of operat
ion (104 +/- 28 versus 140 +/- 28 minutes; p < 0.01), less blood loss
(312 +/- 167 versus 788 +/- 365 mL; p < 0.01), shorter ventilatory sup
port (7.7 +/- 4.1 versus 12.9 +/- 3.4 hours; p < 0.01), and a shorter
postoperative hospital stay (4.4 +/- 1.7 versus 7.7 +/- 2.6 days; p <
0.01) than the patients who underwent the conventional procedure. Conc
lusions. These data suggest that patients who undergo minimally invasi
ve coronary artery bypass grafting have a significant reduction in the
systemic inflammatory response, postoperative morbidity, and hospital
stay compared with patients who undergo conventional coronary artery
bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass.