We examined the ability of a new combined nitric oxide (NO)/nitrogen d
ioxide (NO2) electrochemical analyser (PrinterNO(x), Micro Medical Lim
ited Chatham, Kent, England) to measure NO and NO2 concentrations. The
PrinterNO(x) was compared to a chemiluminescence analyser (42H, Therm
o Environmental Instruments Inc, Franklin MA, U.S.A.). NO and NO2 were
generated in a standard ventilator circuit using a paediatric ventila
tor (900C, Siemens Elema, Sweden) connected to an artificial lung (260
li, TTL Test Lung, Michigan Instruments, MI, U.S.A.). Forty-four paire
d NO measurements ranging from 2.56 ppm to 74.6 ppm and 50 paired NO2
measurements ranging from 0.0 ppm to 5.39 ppm were obtained. For the m
easurement of NO the PrinterNO(x) showed a tendency to overestimate th
e chemiluminescence analyser Regression analysis showed a close relati
onship between the two analysers with r(2) = 0.9981 and a regression e
quation of y = 1.1658 x +0.0197. In the more clinically important rang
e of 0-25 ppm, r(2) increased to 0.9996 with a regression equation of
y = 1.1984 x -0.4657. Conversely the PrinterNO(x) underestimated the c
hemiluminescence analyser for the measurement of NO2. The regression e
quation describing this relationship was y = 0.879 x -0.0447 (r(2) = 0
.9993). We conclude that the PrinterNO(x) is of sufficient accuracy to
be of clinical use in the administration of NO.