M. Ramsay et al., SURVEILLANCE OF MEASLES IN ENGLAND AND WALES - IMPLICATIONS OF A NATIONAL SALIVA TESTING PROGRAM, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 75(6), 1997, pp. 515-521
The impact of a mass vaccination campaign against measles-rubella in E
ngland and Wales was assessed using the results of a saliva test for m
easles-specific IgM which was offered to all notified cases of measles
. By means of clinical data supplied by the reporting doctors, we esti
mated the sensitivity and specificity of various clinical case definit
ions in predicting a confirmed case. A saliva sample was obtained with
in the appropriate time period for 3442/7574 (45.4%) of notified cases
; the proportion confirmed by saliva testing was low and fell from 67/
681 (9.8%) at the start of the campaign to 1/373 (0.3%) after 35 weeks
. The specificity of all clinical case definitions was low, but was hi
ghest at 41.1% (95% confidence interval, 39.2-43.0%) for the definitio
n similar to that recommended in the USA. Extrapolating from cases obs
erved during ongoing surveillance permits estimation of an annual noti
fication rate for nonmeasles rash and fever illness. For countries wit
h good measles control. a clinical case definition is too nonspecific
for accurate surveillance. Laboratory confirmation of suspected measle
s cases is required and saliva testing is an acceptable method. The co
ntinued sensitivity of measles surveillance in England and Wales requi
res that the incidence of notified rash and fever illness and the prop
ortion of cases in which measles infection was excluded by laboratory
testing be monitored.