Cw. Berger et al., NORTH-AMERICAN SURVEY OF THE MANAGEMENT OF DURAL PUNCTURE OCCURRING DURING LABOR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 45(2), 1998, pp. 110-114
Purpose: To document the range and the most common strategies for the
management of the parturient with inadvertent dural puncture (DP) duri
ng labour epidural analgesia. Methods: A confidential survey form was
mailed to 46 academic units in Canada and USA. The responses were comp
iled into Canadian, US and joint North American databases. Results: Th
irty-six centres (78%) responded, representing 137,250 annual deliveri
es. The reported incidence of DP was 0.04-6%. The most common initial
response to DP was re-siting the catheter at another level. Most centr
es made little change in routine practice regarding epidural top-ups a
nd infusion rates after DP. Unrestricted mobilisation was advocated by
86% of centres following delivery; enhanced oral hydration was encour
aged by 61%. Prophylactic epidural blood patch (PEEP) was recommended
by 37% of centres, with twice as many US as Canadian centres doing so.
In the presence of PDPH, EBP was offered most commonly at or within 2
4 hr of diagnosis. Complications were common after EBP: 86% of centres
reported patch failures; 44% reported persistent headache after great
er than or equal to 2 EBP. Despite this, centres remained optimistic a
bout EBP success, quoting cure rates >90% in 58% of centres. Conclusio
n: There is little difference between the practices reported by Canadi
an or US centres. The expressed optimism regarding the efficacy of EBP
is not supported by the evidence available and may be unwarranted. Mo
re research is needed to define the issue better.