The purpose of this article is to give leisure studies a new lease on
its conceptual life by showing how exploratory research can help elimi
nate theoretical stagnation there, which is now admitted by many speci
alists to be a main problem. First, social science exploration is defi
ned and distinguished from the related processes of serendipity, confi
rmation, and qualitative research. Then, after considering the general
character of exploratory research, the discussion shifts to the quest
ion of why there has been so little of it in the leisure sciences. Fin
ally, the ideas presented to this point about theory and methodology a
nd the observations of John Lofland about analytic ethnography, when c
onsidered together, suggest that exploration can be understood as fall
ing within the positivist tradition in both leisure studies in particu
lar and the social sciences in general.