Four scenarios for leisure and the work-leisure relationship are discu
ssed: those characterised by conservatism, reactionism, reformism and
revolutionism. Conservatism means a continuation of leisure seen prima
rily as an industry serving consumers, the work-leisure relationship b
eing primarily one of neutrality. Reactionism means going back to a su
pposed golden age, leisure being equated with simple pleasures, with a
blurring of work and leisure. Reformism is making small changes, such
as offering more choice and better provision of leisure, but still la
rgely separated from work. Revolution implies a rejection of capitalis
t values, promotion of communal forms of leisure in harmony with work.
The question of values in leisure studies is discussed, and it is sug
gested that value differences are legitimate at least in regard to lei
sure policies, leisure politics and leisure philosophy.