The Equal Energy Hypothesis (EEH) is based on the assumption that hear
ing loss from a given exposure is proportional to the total energy of
the exposure. A corollary of this assumption is the power of the expos
ure and the duration of the exposure are interchangeable. Studies of i
mpulse and impact noise show that hearing loss does not follow the pre
diction of the EEH (Ward, 1986; Danielson et al., 1991). Thus, the fol
lowing experiments were designed to assess the relative importance of
the duration and peak level of impact noise in the production of heari
ng loss. Monaural chinchillas served as subjects. Their quiet threshol
ds were estimated before and after exposures using the evoked potentia
l recorded from a chronic electrode in the inferior colliculus. The fo
ur groups of the ''intensity'' series were exposed for 7.5 hours to 20
0 msec impacts at 1 per second at levels of 113, 119, 125, and 131 dB
peak equivalent SPL. The three groups of the ''duration'' series were
exposed to the 125 dB impacts for either 1.9, 7.5, or 30 hours. With e
ach dB increase in the ''duration'' series, there was approximately 1.
7 dB of increase in hearing loss. For each dB increase in peak level a
bove 125 dB, there was an average 6.6 dB increase in hearing loss. The
125 dB exposure is just below the ''critical level'' where the mode o
f cochlear damage shifts to mechanical failure. The results are discus
sed in terms of ''critical'' level and implication for noise standards
.