Pa. Vuilleumier et al., COMPARISON OF PROPACETAMOL AND MORPHINE I N POSTSURGERY ANALGESIA, Schweizerische medizinische Wochenschrift, 128(7), 1998, pp. 259-263
To compare the analgesic efficacy and tolerance of propacetamol and mo
rphine, 80 patients in good clinical condition were included in a pros
pective, parallel, randomized double blind trial after elective surger
y expected to elicit light to moderate postoperative pain. At the end
of general anesthesia, 40 patients received 30 mg/kg propacetamol and
40 0.2 mg/kg morphine, as a 15-min intravenous infusion. The groups we
re similar for age, weight and duration of anesthesia. Supplemental an
algesia had to be given in 7 cases from the propacetamol group vs. 2 c
ases from the morphine group. The postoperative pain, evaluated 7 time
s during 4 h from the end of infusion with a visual analog scale, reve
aled a modest advantage for morphine at 0.5 and 4 h (p = 0.05). The re
spiratory rate was slightly lower after morphine (p = 0.02). No signif
icant differences were observed in blood oxygen saturation, blood pres
sure, heart rate, body temperature and vigilance evaluated by the trai
lmaking test. Nausea was present in 4 cases under propacetamol and 3 u
nder morphine, and pruritus in 2 and 7 cases, respectively. In conclus
ion, propacetamol may represent an alternative to morphine for pain pr
evention after mildly to moderately painful surgery in situations wher
e the use of opioids is unsuitable.