Gl. Sass et S. Henikoff, COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS OF POSITION-EFFECT VARIEGATION MUTATIONS IN DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER DELINEATES THE TARGETS OF MODIFIERS, Genetics, 148(2), 1998, pp. 733-741
In Drosophila melanogaster heterochromatin-induced silencing or positi
on-effect variegation (PEV) of a reporter gene has provided insights i
nto the properties of hetorochromatin. Class I modifiers suppress PEV
and class II modifiers enhance PEV when the modifier gene is present i
n fewer than two doses. We have examined the effects of both class I a
nd class II modifiers on four PEV mutations. These mutations include t
he inversions In(I)w(m4) and In(2R)bw(VDe2), which are classical chrom
osomal rearrangements that typify PEV mutations. The other mutations a
re a derivative of brown(Dominant), in which brown(+) reporters are in
activated by a large block of heterochromatin, and a P[white(+)] trans
poson insertion associated with second chromosome heterochromatin. In
general, we find that class I modifiers affect both classical and nonc
lassical PEV mutations, whereas class II modifiers affect only classic
al PEV mutations. We suggest that class II modifiers affect chromatin
architecture in the vicinity of reporter genes, and only class I modif
iers identify proteins that are potentially involved in heterochromati
n formation or maintenance. In addition, our observations support a mo
del in which there are different constraints on the process of heteroc
hromatin-induced silencing in classical m. nonclassical PEV mutations.