CARRIER SCREENING FOR CYSTIC-FIBROSIS IN PRIMARY-CARE - EVALUATION OFA PROJECT IN SOUTH WALES

Citation
Y. Payne et al., CARRIER SCREENING FOR CYSTIC-FIBROSIS IN PRIMARY-CARE - EVALUATION OFA PROJECT IN SOUTH WALES, Clinical genetics, 51(3), 1997, pp. 153-163
Citations number
45
Categorie Soggetti
Genetics & Heredity
Journal title
ISSN journal
00099163
Volume
51
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
153 - 163
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9163(1997)51:3<153:CSFCIP>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Population carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) was offered to a ll patients aged 16-45 in one general practice in South Wales, excludi ng those in couples with a current pregnancy. Out of 1553 patients in this group, 481 subjects were tested, giving an overall uptake rate of more than 30%. The rate of uptake varied with the mode of invitation. Twenty-six carriers were identified, giving a prevalence of identifie d carriers of 5.4% (1 in 18.5) for those with no family history of CF. A further 18 carriers were identified by cascade testing of these 26. We describe the practical difficulties encountered in setting up this programme in primary care in South Wales. Questionnaires were adminis tered or distributed to all subjects before and after testing. The res ponse rate for the pre-test questionnaire was 95%, and 40-50% for the post-test questionnaires. These showed that, at 3 months post-test, 1 in 4 screen-negative subjects did not appreciate that they had a resid ual risk of being a carrier. At the same time, 15% of this group thoug ht that there was a 1 in 4 chance of a child being affected if one par ent was screen-positive (carried an identified mutation) and the other was screen-negative, and 40% thought there was no risk. Anxiety in re lation to testing did not appear to be a major problem, although indiv idual patterns of response to carrier status varied widely and more se nsitive indicators of psychosocial impact of genetic tests are require d. A pilot study of couple screening showed that this approach is unli kely to be useful in primary care, although we did not assess couple t esting during pregnancy. For any programme of CF carrier screening to be established in primary care, it will be necessary to involve the pr imary care team from the earliest planning stage, so that the opportun ity costs, training needs and other costs of the programme can be full y resourced.