Ro. Estacio et al., THE EFFECT OF NISOLDIPINE AS COMPARED WITH ENALAPRIL ON CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH NON-INSULIN-DEPENDENT DIABETES AND HYPERTENSION, The New England journal of medicine, 338(10), 1998, pp. 645-652
Background It has recently been reported that the use of calcium-chann
el blockers for hypertension may be associated with an increased risk
of cardiovascular complications. Because this issue remains controvers
ial, we studied the incidence of such complications in patients with n
on-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and hypertension who were rando
mly assigned to treatment with either the calcium-channel blocker niso
ldipine or the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor enalapril as pa
rt of a larger study. Methods The Appropriate Blood Pressure Control i
n Diabetes (ABCD) Trial is a prospective, randomized, blinded trial co
mparing the effects of moderate control of blood pressure (target dias
tolic pressure, 80 to 89 mm Hg) with those of intensive control of blo
od pressure (target diastolic pressure, 75 mm Hg) on the incidence and
progression of complications of diabetes. The study also compared nis
oldipine with enalapril as a first-line antihypertensive agent in term
s of the prevention and progression of complications of diabetes. In t
he current study, we analyzed data on a secondary end point (the incid
ence of myocardial infarction) in the subgroup of patients in the ABCD
Trial who had hypertension. Results Analysis of the 470 patients in t
he trial who had hypertension (base-line diastolic blood pressure, gre
ater than or equal to 90 mm Hg) showed similar control of blood pressu
re, blood glucose and lipid concentrations, and smoking behavior in th
e nisoldipine group (235 patients) and the enalapril group (235 patien
ts) throughout five years of follow-up. Using a multiple logistic-regr
ession model with adjustment for cardiac risk factors, we found that n
isoldipine was associated with a higher incidence of fatal and nonfata
l myocardial infarctions (a total of 25) than enalapril (total, 5) (ri
sk ratio, 9.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 21.4). Conclusio
ns In this population of patients with diabetes and hypertension, we f
ound a significantly higher incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial
infarction among those assigned to therapy with the calcium-channel b
locker nisoldipine than among those assigned to receive enalapril. Sin
ce our findings are based on a secondary end point, they will require
confirmation. (C) 1998, Massachusetts Medical Society.