Since the Age of Enlightenment, modernization has taken the form of a
parallel growth of the significance of both the state and the individu
al, at the expense of the intermediary or secondary groups or collecti
ves of various kinds. With a modern notion of over-burdening and high
transaction costs of the mature state and a disrupting alienation of t
he individual, the search for institutional solutions that are ''neith
er market, nor state,'' has intensified in both academia and bureaucra
cies. However, such : efforts often clash with many of the values of m
odern Western society. In Northern Norway, the political struggle over
the reintroduction of Commons Law for Mountain Areas revealed some of
these contradictions. This example also shows why many sub-optimal so
lutions in modern resource management are favored because of the value
attached to individual freedom and equal treatment by the state; even
when these contradict the sustainable governing of a resource. In con
trast, institutional designs based on smaller collectives are perceive
d as less attractive because they involve less individual freedom, mor
e duties and more inequality. The lessons are used for a discussion of
the role of common property institutions in the process of modernisat
ion.