C. Templeman et al., EMERGENCY CERVICAL SUTURE - THE OBSTETRICIANS DILEMMA, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 38(1), 1998, pp. 22-26
We studied the perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with emerg
ency cervical suture at Royal North Shore Hospital over 7 years. There
were 23 patients who had an emergency cervical suture inserted and th
ey were divided into 3 groups for analysis, Group 1: patients with cer
vical dilatation initially detected on routine 18-20 week ultrasonogra
phy and later confirmed on clinical examination, Group 2: cervical dil
atation less than or equal to 3 cm and Group 3: cervical dilatation >3
cm at presentation. The median delay in delivery in each group was 6,
5 and 3 weeks respectively. The perioperative membrane rupture rate f
or emergency suture insertion in this study was 13%, The perinatal mor
tality rate for each group was 0%, 33% and 43% respectively with an ov
erall rate of 33%, Follow-up at 3-5 years of 9 babies with a birth-wei
ght less than or equal to 1,000g, revealed that of 6 survivors, 1 had
moderate disability and 2 had mild disability. No survivors had severe
disability. From the results of our study, emergency cervical suture
can prolong gestation and in the absence of prolapsed fetal membranes,
the perioperative membrane rupture rate is low. However, it is import
ant to consider that the time gained from emergency cervical suture in
sertion may convert a previable fetus into an extremely premature infa
nt with the risk of long-term disability.