VAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS ORAL MISOPROSTOL FOR PREDILATATION OF THECERVIX IN FIRST-TRIMESTER SURGICAL ABORTION

Citation
Mj. Sparrow et al., VAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS ORAL MISOPROSTOL FOR PREDILATATION OF THECERVIX IN FIRST-TRIMESTER SURGICAL ABORTION, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 38(1), 1998, pp. 64-68
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
00048666
Volume
38
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
64 - 68
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-8666(1998)38:1<64:VDVOMF>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Prostaglandins are effective in predilatation of the cervix prior to f irst trimester surgical termination of pregnancy under local analgesia , A randomized open comparative trial was devised to compare the effec tiveness and acceptability of vaginal dinoprostone with oral misoprost ol. Two groups were randomized to control for age, parity and ethnicit y. The operation was easier and less painful in older, parous, and Pol ynesian women. Both methods were effective with respect to ease of dil atation. Both were acceptable and equal with respect to the level of p ain experienced by the woman during the operation. Vaginal dinoproston e is more gradual in its action, but it is more expensive, has to be r efrigerated and self-insertion may sometimes cause problems. Oral miso prostol is considerably cheaper and does not require refrigeration, bu t it was associated with more preoperative nausea, cramping and occasi onal heavy bleeding.