A dynamic modelling approach useful for assessing atmospheric ion depo
sition effects on stand level biomass production and nutrient cycling
in upland forests is presented. The approach quantifies biomass produc
tion and nutrient transfers among the major stand compartments, namely
foliage, wood (which includes branches and medium to coarse roots), f
ine roots, forest floor, mineral soil and soil solution. The main proc
esses addressed are net primary production, litterfall (including thro
ughfall), litter decay (including nutrient mineralization), within-tre
e allocation of photosynthate and nutrients (including translocation o
f nutrients and of photosynthate before foliage fall), nutrient uptake
from available nutrient pools within the soil, ion exchange and reple
nishment of soil bases (Ca, Mg, K, Na) via soil weathering and atmosph
eric deposition. Nitrogen processes include N fixation, mineralization
of organic N (including nitrification) and uptake of nitrate-N and am
monium-N. Sulphur processes include pH-dependent sulphate adsorption a
s modified by soil Fe and Al oxides/hydroxides. A quantitative represe
ntation of these processes leads to stand-structure dependent predicti
ons about (i) ion leaching from the soil (losses of base cations as we
ll as acid cations such as H+ and Alx+), (ii) soil exchangeable bases,
(iii) soil pH, (iv) forest biomass, and (v) nutrient distributions wi
thin the foliage, wood, fine roots and the forest floor for several st
and rotations, based on user-defined regeneration patterns. Informatio
n requirements are limited to (i) stand initialisation (initialising b
iomass and nutrient pools per stand compartment), (ii) specifying annu
al atmospheric deposition rates for all major ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Na
+, H+, NH4+, SO42-, NO3-, HCO3-), and (iii) entering numerical values
for the various process parameters, Values for most parameters can be
obtained from biophysical data sets about biomass and nutrient distrib
utions of mature forest stands. The remaining parameters can be obtain
ed via species-specific model calibration. For a given species, calcul
ations across site-classes and deposition scenarios do nor require add
itional calibration. All calculations are specific to site, species, a
tmospheric deposition scenario and regeneration pattern, and are based
on annual timesteps and transfer rates. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science B.V
.