Soil-solution sampling methods developed more than 50 yr ago are still
routinely used to monitor the fate of contaminants in unsaturated soi
ls. The measured results, expressed as a function of depth or time, ar
e called breakthrough curves (BTC). In this paper, ETC from limited sa
mples are called SBTC, while ABTC are the ETC from the entire soil pro
file and MBTC are mass-flux-based BTC. Conventionally, assumptions hav
e been that: (i) ABTC and MBTC are identical; and (ii) SBTC would accu
rately indicate MBTC when enough samples are collected. In soil with p
referential flow paths, such assumptions may be invalid. The objective
s of this study were to: (i) determine whether increasing the total nu
mber of samples would make SBTC an accurate indicator of contaminant l
oading; (ii) determine whether ABTC and MBTC are identical; and (iii)
explore how to obtain representative MBTC with only a limited number o
f samples, Numerical simulations were conducted in three sets of four,
two-dimensional hypothetical profiles with inclined layers that could
trigger funnel-type preferential Bow paths. Soil-solution samplers at
four different spacings were placed at four depths in each profile. S
imulated results indicate that ABTC always significantly underestimate
MBTC. By increasing the total number of randomly located samples, SBT
C will never accurately indicate MBTC. The SBTC could be modified to b
etter estimate MBTC when preferential weight is assigned according to
the local water flux.