W. Mclean et al., RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH OCCUPATIONAL GLASS INJURY IN BAR STAFF WITH SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF HEPATITIS-B INFECTION, Occupational medicine, 47(3), 1997, pp. 147-150
Since bar workers often sustain cuts from unwashed bar glasses, the ai
ms of this study were to investigate risk of injury and to examine the
sere-prevalence of markers for hepatitis B amongst bar staff. Ninety-
one bar staff recruited by newspaper advertisement were asked about in
jury experience and life-style risks associated with transmission of h
epatitis B and were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and
core antibody (anti-HBc). Seventy-four per cent reported lacerations
from broken glassware at work: 18% had sustained such injuries in more
than 10 incidents. Fifty-five per cent of respondents reported occupa
tional skin contact with body fluids. Anti-HBc prevalence for the stud
y group was 1.1%, suggesting that bar staff were not at increased risk
from hepatitis B infection. Although 30% wore gloves for high-risk ta
sks, there was no evidence that glove wearing prevented glass lacerati
ons. This level oi injury experience and exposure to body fluids is un
acceptable and represents a potential risk of cross-infection. Hepatit
is B immunization should be considered in this group. Urgent action, i
ncluding the replacement, wherever possible, of annealed with tempered
bar-glassware, is necessary to protect bar workers from glass injury.