D. Meller et al., EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT PERFLUOROCHEMICALS ON DORSAL-ROOT GANGLION-CELLSIN-VITRO, Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 236(3), 1998, pp. 182-187
Background: Investigation of the effects of different perfluorochemica
ls (PFC) on cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG) cells. Method: DRG cel
l cultures from 9- to 11-day-old chicken embryos were exposed to emuls
ified perfluorodecalin (PFD; C10F18; 0.5%, 1% and 10%) or perfluorooct
ylbromide (PFO; C8F17Br; 0.5%, 1% and 10%). The cells were evaluated u
nder phase-contrast optics after 30 h and 120 h for 0.5 and 1% and aft
er 5 h for 10%. To study the integrity of neuronal cells, immunohistoc
hemical labelling for neurofilaments (NF) and tubulin (TUB) was perfor
med. Results: Concentrations of 0.5% and 1% of PFD or PFO did not chan
ge immunohistochemical labelling of DRG cells. Go-cultured macrophages
showed a foam cell response, presumably representing ingested PFC. At
both concentrations PFD induced a weaker foam cell response than PFO.
A concentration of 10% led to the death of DRG cells and macrophages
within 5 h. Conclusion: PFC caused a dose-dependent damage of neuronal
cells. Go-cultured macrophages developed a foam cell response similar
to that observed in vivo after prolonged presence of PFC in the vitre
ous body. These observations indicate that PFD and PFO may not be suit
able for long-term vitreous replacement in vitreoretinal surgery. Howe
ver, the model is limited by several factors: (1) there are physiologi
cal differences between DRG cells and retinal ganglion cells; (2) in v
ivo retinal ganglion cells are protected by the overlying tissues; (3)
the PFC used in tissue culture must be emulsified.