Systematists and comparative biologists commonly want to make statemen
ts about relationships among taxa that have never been collectively in
cluded in any single phylogenetic analysis. Construction of phylogenet
ic 'supertrees' provides one solution. Supertrees are estimates of phy
logeny assembled from sets of smaller estimates (source trees) sharing
some but not necessarily all their taxa in common. If certain conditi
ons are met, supertrees can retain all or most of the information from
the source trees and also make novel statements about relationships o
f taxa that do not co-occur on any one source tree. Supertrees have co
mmonly keen constructed using subjective and informal approaches, but
several explicit approaches have recently been proposed.