EFFECTS OF CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS GALLOPAMIL ADMINISTRATION ON BLOOD-PRESSURE, HEART-RATE AND HOLTER-DETECTED ISCHEMIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA - A COMPARISON WITH DILTIAZEM
S. Savonitto et al., EFFECTS OF CONTINUOUS INTRAVENOUS GALLOPAMIL ADMINISTRATION ON BLOOD-PRESSURE, HEART-RATE AND HOLTER-DETECTED ISCHEMIA IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA - A COMPARISON WITH DILTIAZEM, Cardiology in the elderly, 3(3), 1995, pp. 183-188
Background: The intravenous administration of heart rate-lowering calc
ium antagonists, such as verapamil and diltiazem, has proved to be eff
ective in obtaining a prompt and steady reduction of myocardial oxygen
consumption in patients with unstable angina. However, elderly patien
ts can be particularly susceptible to the negative inotropic and dromo
tropic effects of these agents. Methods: In a randomized parallel-grou
p study, we compared the effects of the verapamil derivative gallopami
l (a bolus of 50 mu g/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5-0.8 mu g/kg/mi
n) with those of diltiazem (a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by an infusi
on of 2-5 mu g/kg/min) in 39 patients aged over 70 years (median 77, r
ange 70-87) with a diagnosis of unstable angina. All patients were tre
ated with aspirin, heparin and nitrates during the run-in (24 h) and t
he randomized (48 h) treatment periods. Holter monitoring was performe
d throughout the study. Results: Both agents reduced the systolic bloo
d pressure (P<0.0001 compared with baseline) and the heart rate (P<0.0
01 compared with baseline) to an equal extent in the first hour of inf
usion, a reduction that was maintained during the following 48 h. Dilt
iazem also reduced the diastolic blood pressure from baseline (P<0.01)
, whereas gallopamil had no effect. Only one patient experienced trans
ient asymptomatic hypotension, and another developed first-degree atri
oventricular block with gallopamil. None of the patients developed bra
dycardia or clinical signs of heart failure. During the 24 h run-in pe
riod, 10 episodes of ST-segment depression (177 min) were recorded usi
ng Holter monitoring in the group receiving gallopamil and 22 episodes
(247 min) in those receiving diltiazem. During the 48 h of treatment,
one episode (15 min) of ST-segment depression was recorded in the gal
lopamil group and 17 episodes (294 min) in the diltiazem group (P<0.05
). Conclusion: Both gallopamil and diltiazem, when administered as a c
ontinuous intravenous infusion, reduced the heart rate and systolic bl
ood pressure (and thus myocardial oxygen consumption) in elderly patie
nts with unstable angina without producing adverse cardiac effects. Th
e reduction in diastolic blood pressure observed with diltiazem, but n
ot with gallopamil, might impair coronary perfusion in elderly patient
s. Patients treated with gallopamil had fewer episodes of ST-segment d
epression than those treated with diltiazem.