Tg. Weidner et al., EFFECT OF A RHINOVIRUS-CAUSED UPPER RESPIRATORY ILLNESS ON PULMONARY-FUNCTION TEST AND EXERCISE RESPONSES, Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 29(5), 1997, pp. 604-609
Upper respiratory illness (URI) may cause more frequent acute disabili
ty among athletes than all other diseases combined. The purposes of th
is study were to determine the impact of a rhinovirus-caused URI on re
sting pulmonary function submaximal exercise responses and on maximal
exercise functional capacity. Twenty-four men and 21 women (18-29 yr)
of varying fitness levels were assigned to the experimental group (URI
), and 10 additional individuals served as a control group (CRL). An i
nitial serological screening was performed on all URI group subjects t
o exclude those with the rhinovirus 16(HRV16)antibody. All subjects co
mpleted both a baseline pulmonary function test and a graded exercise
test to volitional fatigue. URI subjects were inoculated with HRV 16 o
n two consecutive days within 10 d of completing these tests. The day
following the second inoculation (peak of illness), post-inoculation p
ulmonary function and graded exercise tests were performed. A noninfec
ted control group completed these same pulmonary and exercise tests 1
wk apart. ANOVA identified no significant differences (P < 0.05) at mi
nutes 2, 5, and 8 for the physiological responses measured between the
pre- and post-exercise tests for both the URI and CRL groups. Further
more. there were no significant differences between maximal exercise p
erformance between running trials for either group. There was also no
significant interaction between treatment (pre/post URI) and group for
any of the pulmonary function measures obtained. In conclusion, physi
ological responses to pulmonary function testing and submaximal and ma
ximal exercise do not appear to be altered by an URI.