G. Fager et O. Wiklund, CHOLESTEROL REDUCTION AND CLINICAL BENEFIT - ARE THERE LIMITS TO OUR EXPECTATIONS, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 17(12), 1997, pp. 3527-3533
Encouraging intervention trials drive our expectations toward more agg
ressive cholesterol-lowering therapies, lower target levels, and less
severe hypercholesterolemia. Available studies may predict which patie
nts, degrees of total cholesterol (TC) reduction, and baseline and tar
get levels of TC provide the most clinical benefit. Data were pooled f
rom seven primary and nine secondary controlled trials with major coro
nary heart disease (CHD) events as primary endpoints. The analysis sho
wed that we can expect large reductions in CHD from TC reduction in pr
imary and secondary prevention. However, the reduction is much larger
in subjects with high TC and/or previous CHD events. The percent reduc
tion in CHD increased exponentially with increasing percent TC reducti
ons, which predicted >70% of the change in CHD. Consequently, we canno
t expect cost-effective clinical benefits from mean reductions in TC >
15 (LDL cholesterol >20)%. The TC level at the study endpoint correlat
ed with CHD incidence irrespective of the study group and explained al
most 45% of CHD incidence. The relationship was progressive and levele
d off at a TC level below about 150 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L) (LDL cholestero
l approximate to 110 mg/dL [approximate to 2.8 mmol/L]). Little extra
clinical benefit can be expected from further reductions. We can expec
t an average 2% reduction in CHD events per percent reduction in TC. W
e can also expect a 2-fold greater clinical benefit among subjects wit
h high initial TC levels than among those with low levels. Finally, we
can expect that the cholesterol-attributable risk is reset to that pr
edicted by the TC level achieved within 4 to 6 years.