P. Martin et al., REPRODUCIBILITY IN RETROSPECTIVE GRADING OF ACUTE GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE AFTER ALLOGENEIC MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, Bone marrow transplantation, 21(3), 1998, pp. 273-279
We have undertaken a formal study to evaluate the reproducibility of r
etrospective assessments for grading the severity of acute GVHD, Using
criteria previously established by the Seattle group, three reviewers
independently assigned GVHD severity grades for a set of 100 marrow t
ransplant patients, Significant differences were found in the distribu
tion of GVHD grades assigned by one of the reviewers as compared to th
e other two reviewers. In only 40% of cases did all three reviewers as
sign the same GVHD grade, and in only 68-71% of cases did all three re
viewers assign the same grade within 0-I vs II-IV_or 0-II vs III-IV ca
tegories, Despite the high rate of disagreement between any two review
ers, at least two reviewers assigned the same overall GVHD grade in 93
% of cases, These results suggest that current criteria for assessing
the severity of GVHD by a single reviewer are not sufficiently reliabl
e for rigorous clinical studies, As an alternative to the original cri
teria, we have developed and tested simplified criteria that summarize
the clinical course of GVHD as reflected by the progression of diseas
e and the amount of immunosuppressive treatment used to control the di
sease, Our results suggest that the revised criteria might yield more
reproducible retrospective grading than the original criteria, Althoug
h the original criteria and the revised criteria might produce differe
nt results for individual patients, the overall distributions of grade
s with the two systems were similar, The proposed revised criteria cou
ld be implemented without disrupting the continuity and consistency wi
th previous grading assigned by the original criteria.