DEVELOPMENT OF LIPOSOMAL AMPHOTERICIN-B FORMULATION

Citation
M. Gulati et al., DEVELOPMENT OF LIPOSOMAL AMPHOTERICIN-B FORMULATION, Journal of microencapsulation, 15(2), 1998, pp. 137-151
Citations number
84
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
02652048
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
137 - 151
Database
ISI
SICI code
0265-2048(1998)15:2<137:DOLAF>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
A considerable effort has been spent in the past three decades to inve stigate various aspects of liposomes as novel drug delivery systems. I n 1990, the first amphotericin B (AmB) liposomal preparation (L-AmB) u nder the brand name AmBisome dagger was introduced into the market by Vestar. The successful marketing of the product moved liposomes out of the stage of experimental obscurity to the realistic stage of clinica l utility. The launch of AmBisome sparked off the introduction of othe r lipid-based AmB products marketed by Liposome Technology (Amphocil) and The Liposome Co. (Abelcet). The drive behind the development of a modified formulation of AmB was to improve the therapeutic index of th is drug with respect to its major drawback associated with both acute and chronic toxic effects. In a 30-year-long experience with AmB, seve ral reports were recorded in the literature of acute adverse effects, such as fever, rigors, vomiting, cardiotoxicity and hypotension occurr ing during infusion; while long-term therapy was reported to be associ ated with hypokalemia, renal dysfunction and hematological abnormaliti es. Another serious problem encountered with the drug had been the poo r response obtained in immunocompromised patients like those with AIDS , neutropenia and cancer patients on chemotherapy. The encapsulation o f amphotericin B in liposomal vesicles was hence targeted not only to obtain an improvement in the therapeutic index but also to see if it w as useful in eradicating deep-sealed fungal infections in immunocompro mised patients. The liposomal AmB was found to have a better therapeut ic index and lower toxicity than the commercial AmB preparations. The LD50 of AmBisome in mouse was 175 mg/kg compared with 3.7 mg/kg for Fu ngizone, the commercial preparation of AmB. Additionally, L-AmB has pr olonged circulation time, and extravasates into the site of infection and delivers the drug directly to the site, with no nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity as experienced with AmB. This review traces the course of development of L-AmB and discusses the rationale behind the develop ment of its liposomal preparation. The results in in vitro, in vivo an d clinical studies, mechanism of action, biodistribution, and formulat ion considerations of L-AmB are described. The clinical experience wit h the marketed preparation is reviewed.