SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF ENZYME-CONTAINING PERSONAL CLEANSING PRODUCTS - EXPOSURE CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF IGE ANTIBODY TO ENZYMES AFTER A 6-MONTH USE TEST
Ck. Kelling et al., SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF ENZYME-CONTAINING PERSONAL CLEANSING PRODUCTS - EXPOSURE CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF IGE ANTIBODY TO ENZYMES AFTER A 6-MONTH USE TEST, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 101(2), 1998, pp. 179-187
Background: Enzyme-containing personal cleansing products were being c
onsidered for the consumer market. Although enzymes have been marketed
safely for many years as ingredients in laundry products, their use i
n a personal cleansing application represented a new type of exposure
for consumers that was not supported by the historical safety data. An
exposure assessment and additional safety data would be needed before
marketing to ensure consumer safety. Objective: The work in this pape
r was designed to evaluate the potential for inhalation exposure to th
e enzyme during use of this new product while showering. Then a clinic
al trial was conducted to determine whether or not the level, duration
, and routes of exposure encountered during use of this product would
induce a Type I sensitization response to the enzyme. Methods: Exposur
e was assessed during normal showering activities by collecting air sa
mples with both high volume and personal samplers and quantitating enz
yme levels with an ELISA. To assess the potential for sensitization, p
anelists were asked to use a prototype protease-containing bar product
for all personal cleansing tasks and to keep a use diary reporting an
y associated symptoms. Physical and dermatologic examinations and skin
prick tests with enzyme were conducted before the test commenced and
at 2-month intervals. Results: Exposure assessment results showed that
airborne enzyme levels were primarily dependent on the concentration
of the enzyme in the personal cleansing product. Mean values for total
airborne enzyme protein ranged from 5.7 to 11.8 ng/m(3) when enzyme c
oncentration, time of use, and measurement technique remained constant
. After 6 months of at-home product use, four of 61 test subjects usin
g the enzyme-containing bar had positive skin prick test responses whe
n tested with the enzyme. The skin prick test data were supplemented w
ith serologic analyses, which detected IgE specific for the protease e
nzyme. None of these subjects showed any clinical symptoms indicative
of allergic reaction. Conclusion: The ability of enzymes to induce dev
elopment of allergic antibodies in this study led to the conclusion th
at this prototype enzyme-containing personal cleansing bar would repre
sent an inappropriate use of enzymes in a consumer product application
. The likelihood of both induction of an immunologic response and subs
equent elicitation of allergy symptoms in a small but significant frac
tion of the user population was high. This finding resulted in the dec
ision to halt further development of this prototype.