DISSECTION OF THE GRASS ALLERGEN-SPECIFIC IMMUNE-RESPONSE IN PATIENTSWITH ALLERGIES AND CONTROL SUBJECTS - T-CELL PROLIFERATION IN PATIENTS DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH SPECIFIC SERUM IGE AND SKIN REACTIVITY
Pa. Wurtzen et al., DISSECTION OF THE GRASS ALLERGEN-SPECIFIC IMMUNE-RESPONSE IN PATIENTSWITH ALLERGIES AND CONTROL SUBJECTS - T-CELL PROLIFERATION IN PATIENTS DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH SPECIFIC SERUM IGE AND SKIN REACTIVITY, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 101(2), 1998, pp. 241-249
Background: Pollinosis, caused by grasses of the Poaceae family, is a
problem worldwide. The relative importance of grass groups 1 and 5 maj
or allergens is well established. However, not much is known about the
recognition of these allergens by T cells and whether this T-cell rea
ctivity correlates with skin reactivity and serum IgE levels. Objectiv
es: The aim of this study was to characterize the cross-reactive, gras
s allergen-specific T-cell responses from patients allergic to grass a
nd nonatopic individuals and to investigate whether these responses co
rrelate with grass-specific IgE and skin reactivity. Methods: Skin pri
ck test wheal areas and grass-specific serum IgE levels were determine
d in all patients (n = 21) and nonallergic control donors (n = 20). Pe
ripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated and stimulated with gra
ss allergen extracts (Phleum pratense, Poa pratensis, Lolium perenne)
and immunoaffinity-purified group 5 allergens, and the production of t
ype 1 and type 2 cytokines was determined in the patient group. Result
s: Donors allergic to grass showed increased T-cell-proliferative resp
onses to grass allergens compared with nonatopic control subjects, We
find it interesting that the magnitude of the patients' T-cell respons
es could not be correlated with the individual skin prick test areas a
nd specific serum IgE levels, and several patients with allergies to g
rass had group 5-specific T-cell responses in the absence of group 5-s
pecific IgE. The absence of a correlation between T-cell proliferation
and IgE levels or skin prick test results may in part be explained by
the finding that patients predominantly produced IL-5 in response to
Phl p 5, the major allergen, and predominantly IFN-gamma in response t
o Phl p extract. In general, all donors responded equally well to all
three grasses. Additional experiments with Phl p 5-specific T-cell lin
es indicated that the equal proliferation of peripheral blood mononucl
ear cells to all three species is the direct result of cross-reactivit
y. Conclusions: Grass allergen-specific T-cell responses are highly cr
oss-reactive, and patients with allergies exhibit higher responses tha
n nonallergic donors, suggesting that T cells are involved in the alle
rgic reaction to grass group 5 allergens. However, group 5-specific T-
cell responses are also found in donors without group 5-specific IgE,
and the patients' grass-specific T-cell responses and cytokine product
ion do not correlate to skin reactivity or to concentrations of grass-
specific IgE.