As we construct the fusion of medical embryology and medical genetics,
it is important to be aware of how the history of genetics has been w
ritten to exclude embryology, This article looks at the rhetoric of ge
netics and how that rhetoric fits a paradigm of supersessionism, Super
sessionism is often seen in the history of religion when one sect clai
ms superiority to the original sect from whence it emerged, Such super
sessionism portrays embryology as a failed research program, one that
genetics now has saved, In some instances, biblical references have al
luded to the failed nature of embryology, Although this article does n
ot criticize the data of genetics, it takes issue with the historiogra
phy used by geneticists and seeks to show that the mergers between gen
etics and embryology are those between two equal partners and not betw
een an inferior and superior member. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.