S. Dopkins et T. Gleason, COMPARING EXEMPLAR AND PROTOTYPE MODELS OF CATEGORIZATION, Canadian journal of experimental psychology, 51(3), 1997, pp. 212-230
Five experiments contrasted the prototype and exemplar theories of cat
egorization, The stimuli for the experiments were simple perceptual fi
gures that varied along two multi-valued dimensions. During the learni
ng phase of each experiment, participants assigned each of a series of
stimuli to one of two categories and received feedback concerning the
ir assignments. During the generalization phase, participants made cat
egory judgments with respect to novel stimuli, including some crucial
test stimuli that were (a) more similar to the prototype of one of the
two categories, and at the same time, (b) more similar, on average, t
o the exemplars of the other category. Participants assigned the test
stimuli to the latter category. This was taken as evidence favoring th
e exemplar over the prototype theory.