J. Sonner et al., DESFLURANE AND NITROUS-OXIDE, BUT NOT NONIMMOBILIZERS, AFFECT NOCICEPTIVE RESPONSES, Anesthesia and analgesia, 86(3), 1998, pp. 629-634
Nonimmobilizers (previously called nonanesthetics) do not prevent move
ment in response to a noxious stimulus, even at doses predicted to pro
duce anesthesia. We hypothesized they would also lack antinociceptive
effects. We tested this prediction using the tail-flick latency (TFL)
test. As predicted, the two nonimmobilizers tested (1,2-dichlorohexafl
uorocyclobutane and perfluoropentane) did not alter TFL, whereas desfl
urane and nitrous oxide both lengthened TFL (nitrous oxide at a lower
minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration [MAC]-multiple than desflura
ne). In addition, we found that 0.1 MAC desflurane had a hyperalgesic
effect (shortened TFL). Implications: We studied the response of anima
ls inhaling anesthetics or nonimmobilizers (compounds predicted to be
anesthetics from the Meyer-Overton relation) to painful stimuli. Nonim
mobilizers had no effect on these responses; at a low partial pressure
, desflurane was hyperalgesic; nitrous oxide and, at higher partial pr
essures, desflurane were antinociceptive.