''Controlled scrimping'' involves the containment of selected developm
ent costs and time-to-market by being less than thorough in non-critic
al areas. Resources marshalled from scrimping can be redeployed to inc
rease the number of projects undertaken, diversify the project portfol
io or increase the number of products developed. A comparative study o
f 60 U.S. and 60 Japanese products revealed that although overall new
product success rates were not significantly lower when U.S. firms scr
imped, Japanese firms that scrimped experienced significantly lower su
ccess rates. The explanation for these differences is rooted in the di
ssimilar U.S. and Japanese cultures that inhibit Japanese firms from e
ngaging in successful scrimping. However, U.S. managers ave advised to
use scrimping strategies cautiously as scrimping necessarily increase
s the risk of product failure. The challenge is to manage the tradeoff
s between scrimping time-to-market product quality and the risk of pro
duct failure within a portfolio of new product R&D efforts.