Se. Salmon et al., INTERFERON VERSUS INTERFERON PLUS PREDNISONE REMISSION MAINTENANCE THERAPY FOR MULTIPLE-MYELOMA - A SOUTHWEST-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY, Journal of clinical oncology, 16(3), 1998, pp. 890-896
Purpose: We evaluated the vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone
(VAD) regimen alone or with chemosensitizers for remission induction a
nd interferon (IFN) versus IFN plus prednisone (IFN/P) for remission m
aintenance in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Patients and Meth
ods: Two hundred thirty-three patients were registered for remission-i
nduction therapy with VAD or VAD plus the chemosensitizers verapamil a
nd quinine. Patients who achieved remission were randomized to mainten
ance therapy with IFN alpha 3 MU in the evening three times weekly or
IFN plus 50 mg of prednisone (IFN/P) on the morning after IFN until re
lapse. Results: two hundred twenty-nine patients were eligible for ind
uction. Fatal toxicities in nine patients who received VAD plus verapa
mil and quinine led to closure of this arm after 47 registrations. Sub
sequently, all patients received VAD induction. Despite the high early
mortality rate on VAD plus sensitizers, overall survival by induction
arm did not differ for median or 5-year survival with approximately 4
0% of patients surviving 5 years. Eighty-nine eligible patients who ac
hieved remission were randomized to maintenance. Patients who received
IFN/P had improved progression-free survival (median, 19 v9 months fo
r IFN; P = .008). After 48 months, progression-free survival on IFN/P
was at the thirtieth percentile, whereas it was below the tenth percen
tile on IFN alone. Median survival from start of maintenance was long
on both arms (57 months for IFN/P v46 months for IFN; P = .36). Conclu
sion: IFN/P was more effective than IFN alone. Improved relapse-free s
urvival may be attributable to IFN/P or to the use of prednisone for m
aintenance. This latter alternative is currently being studied. (C) 19
98 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.