S. Evangelista et al., ANTIHISTAMINIC AND ANTIALLERGIC PROPERTIES OF DEXTRO-MEQUITAMIUM IODIDE IN UPPER AND LOWER GUINEA-PIG AIRWAYS - COMPARISON WITH AZELASTINE, General pharmacology, 30(4), 1998, pp. 513-519
1. The ability of dextro-mequitamium iodide (d-Meq) to antagonize bron
chomotor and inflammatory effects mediated by histamine and antigen ch
allenge in the upper or lower guinea pig airways or both and its poten
tial activity against the recruitment and activation of eosinophils in
the bronchial wall have been evaluated in comparison with azelastine.
2. In receptor-binding studies, d-Meq displayed a nanomolar affinity
for H1 and muscarinic receptors, and it was endowed with potent bronch
odilating properties in the nanomolar range toward tonic contractions
induced by histamine and carbachol. 3. d-Meq (100-1,000 nmol/guinea pi
g) and azelastine (100-5,000 nmol/guinea pig) administered by aerosol
significantly inhibited histamine-and antigen-induced increases in ins
ufflation pressure in sensitized animals. 4. d-Meq (1,000-6,000 nmol/k
g IV) dose dependently inhibited the histamine or antigen-induced incr
ease in vascular permeability in the upper airways. 5. d-Meq was more
effective against histamine than antigen challenge, and its potency wa
s similar or greater than that of azelastine. 6. Aerosolized d-Meq (1,
000 nmol/animal) reduced antigen-induced eosinophil accumulation in th
e bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid from sensitized guinea pigs. 7. E
osinophils recovered from the BAL fluid of antigen-challenged animals
showed an increased chemotaxis in response to LTB4 or platelet-activat
ing factor. Both d-Meq and azelastine (300 nmol/animal) reduced this i
ncrease without affecting direct chemotaxis induced by leukotriene B-4
(LTB4). 8. These findings provide evidence that local administration
of d-Meq might be useful in the treatment of allergic disorders, such
as rhinitis and asthma. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.