Jl. Phelps et al., EARNED SECURITY, DAILY STRESS, AND PARENTING - A COMPARISON OF 5 ALTERNATIVE MODELS, Development and psychopathology, 10(1), 1998, pp. 21-38
Research suggests that adults who have developed a coherent perspectiv
e on their negative, early attachment relationships (i.e., earned secu
res) do not reenact poor parenting practices with their own children:
However, no studies have addressed whether earned secures maintain pos
itive parenting under the pressures of aversive environmental conditio
ns. This study tested five alternative models that predict how earned
secures parent under low and high stress in comparison to adults who h
ad a positive upbringing (i.e., continuous secures) and adults who hav
e an incoherent perspective on a troubled childhood (i.e., insecures).
Only if earned secures exhibit effective caregiving under high stress
, in comparison to the other security groups, can it be assumed that t
hey have broken the intergenerational cycle of poor parenting. The Adu
lt Attachment Interview was used to classify 97 mothers as earned secu
re, continuous secure, and insecure. Home observations of parenting an
d maternal self-reports of daily hassles (our stress measure) were obt
ained when children were 27 months old. Planned comparisons revealed t
hat the diathesis-stress/incoherent present state of mind model most a
ccurately predicted parenting. Thus, under high stress, the earned sec
ures parented equivalently to the continuous secures and more positive
ly than the insecures; under low stress no group differences were obta
ined. These findings indicate that in a normative sample earned secure
s break the intergenerational cycle and exhibit resilient parenting ev
en under high stress conditions.