P. Lemelin et D. Schmitt, THE RELATION BETWEEN HAND MORPHOLOGY AND QUADRUPEDALISM IN PRIMATES, American journal of physical anthropology, 105(2), 1998, pp. 185-197
Primate hands can be classified into two broad categories on the basis
of ray proportions and other features, Ectaxonic hands are characteri
zed by a longer fourth ray and are found in most strepsirhines. Most h
aplorhines possess mesaxonic hands which are characterized by a longer
third ray. Preuschoft et al, ([1993] in H. Preuschoft and D.J. Chiver
s (eds,): Hands of Primates. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 21 - 30) pro
posed a biomechanical model which predicts that, during quadrupedalism
, a mesaxonic hand should be held in a more neutral position with resp
ect to the forearm, whereas an ectaxonic hand should be more ulnarly d
eviated, The relation between hand positioning and the mesaxony/ectaxo
ny categorization is investigated for 27 primate taxa. Videotapes were
recorded for each species walking quadrupedally on arboreal supports,
Several species were also videotaped during ground quadrupedalism. Th
e degree of deviation of the hand relative to the substrate and the gr
ips utilized were quantified for 18 species from the videotapes, Prima
tes with mesaxonic hands use deviated hand positions and grips, especi
ally when walking quadrupedally on small poles. Several species with e
ctaxonic hands use neutral hand positions and grips when walking quadr
upedally on similar supports. Also, several primates, with either ecta
xonic or mesaxonic hands, display a combination of deviated hand posit
ions and grips when on arboreal substrates and neutral hand positionin
g when on the ground, The statistical results indicate that hand posit
ioning during quadrupedal walking Is more variable than expected based
on the mesaxony/ectaxony classification, Furthermore, radiographic da
ta suggest that primates evolved at least two different mechanisms of
hand ulnar deviation. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.