VARIATION IN PHOTOPERIOD RESPONSE OF DIFFERENT ISOGENIC LINES OF WILDOATS (AVENA-FATUA)

Citation
Lj. Armstrong et Sw. Adkins, VARIATION IN PHOTOPERIOD RESPONSE OF DIFFERENT ISOGENIC LINES OF WILDOATS (AVENA-FATUA), Weed science, 46(1), 1998, pp. 39-47
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences",Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
00431745
Volume
46
Issue
1
Year of publication
1998
Pages
39 - 47
Database
ISI
SICI code
0043-1745(1998)46:1<39:VIPROD>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
For wild oats, persistence characters such as seed production and seed dormancy may be affected by generic variation and several environment al factors during the development of the parental plant. However, the effect of varying photoperiods on such characters is unclear. Previous studies have concentrated on natural populations and have nor studied the genetic variability within the population. Consequently a study w as conducted to examine how photoperiod (10, 12, 14, 16, and 18 h at 2 0 C) influenced the persistence of different members of a synthetic po pulation of wild oats. This synthetic population consisted of several isogenic lines with differing degrees of seed dormancy that originated from one region in North America. All lines were photoperiod sensitiv e, quantitative long day planes, with an increase in time to maturity for all lines (about 78 to 213 d) when photoperiod was reduced from 18 to 10 h. The lines within this synthetic population (with the excepti on of one, M73) showed a similar degree of photoperiod sensitivity. Th is may be expected, as the lines are from one region with the same pho toperiod environment. It could be concluded that such a photoperiod se nsitivity is a beneficial character that has allowed persistence of th ese lines in this region. When photoperiod was reduced from 18 to 10 h , plants produced fewer seeds (about 141 to 61 primary seeds per plant ) with a higher degree of seed dormancy (about 88 to 54% germination i n 10(-4) M gibberellic acid; GA(3)). The reduced seed production under the shortest photoperiod (10 h) was due to poor panicle exsertion, wh ich resulted in poor development of basal florets. There was no consis tent relationship between photoperiod and other plant characters such as tiller production, caryopsis weight, and water content. However, si gnificant relationships were found between seed dormancy characters an d other plant characters such as maturity time, caryopsis weight, and water content under certain photoperiod treatments.