Toe transfer is a well established procedure for thumb and finger reco
nstruction after mutilation. The indications in congenital malformatio
ns are a mater of controversy. Out of a personal series of 209 patient
s, 42 were children presenting a congenital malformation. Thirty six,
with 46 transfers were available for review. There is only one failure
at the biginning of our experience. The main indication was absence o
f pinch either due to absence of thumb (like in congenital band syndro
me or some extreme cases of ulnar club hand or cleft hand) or absence
of long finger (like in symbrachydactyly monodactylous type) or lack o
f both thumb and finger (like in peromelic type of symbrachydactyly).
In this last type, we have been disappointed by the functional result
of the distal implantation of two second toes taken from both feet; we
have proposed a ''stub'' operation consisting in a second toe transfe
r on the anterior aspect of the radial epiphysis to take advantage of
the mobility of the wrist and the availability of plenty tendon transf
er (in this proximal situation. When planing to ''built'' an absent pi
ncer, an early age is mandatory for operation (mean 12 months), to ens
ure a good cortical integration. A less frequent indication is a parti
al toe transfer with a vascularized epiphysis to provide growth and mo
bility in some cases of thumb hypoplasia (like in symbrachydactyly or
Blauth and Manske type III b). Results are difficult to assess due to
the early operation but if the mobility has been disappointing (mean 3
2 degrees), sensibility (mean 2PD 5nm) and growth were excellent.