The reasons for the predominant electron-donicity of almost all solid
polar surfaces and its implications are discussed in this paper. By co
ntact angle or interfacial tension measurements, the electron-acceptin
g as well as the electron-donating properties of polar liquids can be
ascertained, through the interplay between their energies of adhesion
and cohesion. For the solid-liquid interface, direct interfacial tensi
on measurements are not possible, but indirectly, solid/liquid interfa
cial tensions of polar systems can be obtained by contact angle measur
ement. However, as the energy of cohesion of a solid does not influenc
e the contact angle formed by a liquid drop placed upon its surface, o
ne can only measure the solid surface's residual polar property, manif
ested by the energy of adhesion between solid and liquid. This residua
l polar property is of necessity the dominant component; in most cases
this turns out to be its electron donicity. When, by means of contact
angle measurements with polar liquids, both electron-accepting and el
ectron-donating potentials are found on a polar solid, it is most like
ly still partly covered with a polar liquid: usually water. The amount
of residual water of hydration of a polar solid follows from its pola
r (Lewis acid-base) surface tension component (gamma(AB)). The degree
of orientation of the residual water of hydration on a polar solid can
be expressed by the ratio of the electron-donating to electron-accept
ing potentials (gamma(+)/gamma(-)), measured on the hydrated surface.