Evidence-based medicine aims to identify, critically appraise, and app
ly the best available evidence in making decisions about the care of p
atients. These aims are similar to those conscientious clinicians have
always sought to achieve, but an evidence-based approach applies a sy
stematic and rigorous methodology to this process to ensure that the e
vidence applied is relevant and of high quality. Because of the volume
of potentially relevant information that needs to be accessed from th
e medical literature, many clinicians rely on reviews of the evidence.
Systematic reviews provide summaries of the results of evidence-based
healthcare, which can be made available to clinicians, healthcare adm
inistrators, and patients. The use of explicit, systematic methods in
reviews limits bias (systematic errors) and reduces random errors (sim
ple mistakes), thus providing reliable results on which to draw conclu
sions and make decisions. Meta-analysis is the use of statistical meth
ods to summarize the results of independent studies. When used appropr
iately, meta-analysis can provide more precise estimates of the effect
s of healthcare than those derived from the individual studies include
d in a review. Childhood respiratory diseases can be a challenging are
a in which to undertake clinical research. These challenges include di
agnostic uncertainty, lack of objective endpoints, and aspects of gene
ralizability of randomized controlled trials. Despite these difficulti
es, there are now many examples of systematic reviews and evidence-bas
ed approaches in pediatric pulmonology. if applied appropriately, they
can ensure that management of patients is based on clinically useful
diagnostic tests and treatments that have been shown to be effective a
nd not harmful. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.