This review examines whether there is a direct or indirect relation be
tween damp or mould in the home and respiratory health. Home dampness
is thought to have health consequences because it has the potential to
increase the proliferation of house-dust mites and moulds, both of wh
ich are allergenic. The results from the many studies conducted to inv
estigate whether damp and mould are associated with health outcomes ar
e difficult to compare because the methods of measuring exposures and
health outcomes have not been standardized. However, the studies that
have been conducted in children are probably the most reliable because
the confounding effects of active smoking or occupational exposures a
re absent, and because the presence of symptoms of cough and wheeze ha
ve been consistently investigated in many studies. The increased risk
of children having these symptoms if the home has damp or mould is fai
rly small with an odds ratio that is generally in the range 1.5-3.5, t
hese estimates being statistically significant when the sample size ha
s been large enough. This range is consistent with the measured effect
s of other environmental exposures which are considered important to h
ealth, such as environmental tobacco smoke or outdoor air pollutants.
The potential benefits of reducing mould in the home have not been inv
estigated, and the few studies that have investigated health improveme
nts as a result of increasing ventilation or reducing damp in order to
reduce house-dust mite levels suggest that this intervention is expen
sive, requires a large commitment, and is unlikely to be successful in
the long term. This implies that houses need to be specifically desig
ned for primary prevention of respiratory problems associated with ind
oor allergen proliferation rather than using post hoc procedures to im
prove indoor climate and reduce allergen load as a secondary or tertia
ry preventive strategy.