Failure to obtain convincing results in psychiatric genetics can partl
y be attributed to the fact that progress in molecular biology and gen
etic epidemiology has not been followed by an equivalent development i
n phenotypic description. Instead of relying entirely on classical nos
ological approaches, we argue that identifying more homogeneous forms
of diseases through a 'candidate symptom approach' among affected subj
ects and an endophenotype approach that identifies sub-clinical traits
among non-affected relatives might yield better results. Examples whe
re these strategies have already been fruitful when applied to complex
diseases are presented in this review. Focusing on vulnerability trai
ts might stimulate the redefinition of traditional psychiatric syndrom
es and help to bridge the gap between clinical and experimental approa
ches.