The sobering findings of the Fort Bragg study illustrate why ambitious
demonstration projects must be combined with objective outcome evalua
tions. The study does suggest that ''more is not always better'' (L. B
ickman, 1996), but more of what? Little is known about the specific in
terventions that were combined to form the Fort Bragg system of care,
so the study does nor really reveal what failed or what needs to be ch
anged. Moreover there is no evidence that the specific treatments used
had any empirical support. Combining and systematizing various treatm
ents mag, not produce improved outcomes if the treatments are not effe
ctive in the first place. Costly demonstration programs that combine u
ntested treatments may be a poor investment. A better strategy may be
to develop and test an array of well-documented treatments for an army
of child and family problems, creating the building blocks needed for
effective systems of care in the future.