Ja. Knight et al., AN ASSESSMENT OF THE INFLUENCE OF CLINICAL BREAST EXAMINATION REPORTSON THE INTERPRETATION OF MAMMOGRAMS IN A BREAST SCREENING-PROGRAM, Breast cancer research and treatment, 48(1), 1998, pp. 65-71
The population-based Ontario Breast Screening Program (OBSP) provides
two-yearly screening by both nurse examiner clinical breast examinatio
n (CBE) and two-view mammography to women aged 50 to 69. CBE alone acc
ounts for about 5% of cancer detection. The purpose of this study was
to determine whether CBE information affects radiologists' interpretat
ion of mammography. Interpretation was defined by 1) radiologists' ref
erral rates for diagnostic evaluation and 2) radiologists' accuracy in
distinguishing cancer from non-cancer on mammograms. Mammograms were
obtained from women randomly selected from those screened in the OBSP
between 1990 and 1992. Selection was stratified by whether or not the
nurse examiner had independently referred for diagnostic evaluation. A
dditional women diagnosed with breast cancer were selected to increase
the precision of the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. E
ach participating OBSP radiologist read a set of mammograms twice, app
roximately three weeks apart. The first reading was based on mammogram
s alone. At the second reading, the CBE report was included on the rep
orting form. Among 620 women referred by the nurse, radiologist referr
al rate increased from 37.7% to 40.8% (p = 0.079) when CBE information
was available. Among the 637 not referred by the nurse? radiologist r
eferral rate decreased from 29.8% to 25.6% (p = 0.005). There was litt
le effect on the sensitivity and specificity of radiologist referral a
nd the areas under the two ROC curves (with and without CBE informatio
n) were not significantly different (p = 0.571). Although there was so
me effect of CBE information on radiologists' pattern of referral, the
re was no effect on accuracy of cancer detection.