Jj. Jaeger et al., ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF ASIAN HOMINOID PRIMATES - PALEONTOLOGICAL DATA VERSUS MOLECULAR-DATA, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie 3, Sciences de la vie, 321(1), 1998, pp. 73-78
The origin and evolution of hominoid primates (apes and man) has long
been studied exclusively on the basis of available fossil remains. Ind
eed, a migration of African primates towards Asia at about -16 to -17
Ma might have given the lineage of Miocene Asian hominoids. This hypot
hesis is supported by the oldest remains of Miocene Asian hominoids da
ted at about -16.1 Ma. But the recent discovery of anthropoid primates
in the Eocene of Asia seems to indicate that Asia was a major evoluti
onary and differentiation centre for anthropoid primates as early as t
he Eocene. In addition, Asian primates probably continued to evolve in
Asia from the Eocene onward and led at least to the extant Asian homi
noids (orangutans and gibbons). African and Asian extant anthropoid pr
imates might therefore have diverged at least 36 Ma ago, and this hypo
thesis is also supported by the most recent data in molecular biology.
Moreover, an Asiatic origin of African Paleogene propliopithecine pri
mates is suggested. In that context, evolutionary rates might not be c
onstant, and molecular clocks should be necessarily characteristic for
each studied group of mammals. Several examples that illustrate the c
onflict between paleontological and molecular data are discussed. The
necessity to integrate more systematically paleontological data as chr
onological reference points in studies in molecular phylogeny is discu
ssed. ((C) Academie des sciences/Elsevier, Paris.).