The intermethod variabilities of control materials and patient blood s
amples for the measurement of glycohemoglobin were compared. Sets of 5
0 blood samples and 15 control materials were analyzed by HPLC and aff
inity and immunochemical methods. For each pair of methods, the distan
ces of the materials from the regression line of patient blood results
(expressed as normalized residuals) were calculated. Only two of 15 c
ontrols had normalized residuals exceeding 3 standard deviations from
the regression line. Total hemoglobin (Hb) content, Hb derivatives, an
d cellulose acetate electrophoresis demonstrated that only a minority
of controls could be considered similar to patients' blood samples. We
selected Menarini's and our home-prepared controls to simulate calibr
ation of the different techniques by these materials. Intermethod cali
bration succeeded mostly in harmonizing results obtained by HPLC metho
ds. On the contrary, calibration of the immunochemical techniques (Boe
hringer and Roche) did not improve intermethod agreement to a clinical
ly useful level.